![]() |
A letter from a Concerned Citizen
|
![]() |
|
Home | Nebulae | Galaxies | Star Clusters | Solar System | About Me | My Equipment | Copyright Notice |
||
-------------
Phillip Tollefson, CEO of Colorado Springs Utilities:
The 8000 refers to the number of lights estimated to be needed for areas currently without lights. Replacements, upgrades, etc are done on an ongoing basis and will also be supported by the proposed rate. There are about 4000 mercury vapor lights in service that are less efficient than high pressure sodium lights to be installed. We will replace those as possible.
We are continuing to work on the scheduling/prioritization process in the transition of responsibilities from Traffic to CSU. There are some standards regarding placement at intersections and spacing in between depending on roadway design, traffic volume, etc. We anticipate being able to satisfy all currently outstanding residential requests in 2003 and begin placing arterials in p! riority as recommended by Police and Traffic based on public safety assessments, etc. Once the decision criteria are a little more finalized, they will, of course, be available for public review.
Something like 75% of the backlog is for arterial roadways. There is more info on this in the Attachment. We do expect to continue the process of residents within 100 ft of a proposed residential light agreeing to its placement unless there is an overriding safety or technical issue, etc.
Residential light design can get pretty complicated, since some standards are set by a local association or group agreement. For example, old Colo City area wants all "period" lighting, some folks in Cedar Heights wanted natural gas lights. We basically try to meet the light output standards and then match whatever architectural style folks want within reason. Obviously, we don't want to go overboard on this due to inventory management, ! spare parts, etc. We are not currently looking at adding any new designs to our inventory, to my knowledge.
Phillip also included this fact sheet in his response:
FACT SHEET – STREET LIGHTS
BACKGROUND
Colorado Springs Utilities installs, maintains and operates streetlights within its service territory (City Traffic Engineering – prior to the current proposal – directed the location and number of lights to be installed). The City of Colorado Springs was then billed for these services – services that were paid for out of the City General Fund Budget.
Due to competing priorities in police and fire services and capital improvements – in addition to other budget constraints – the City has been unable to keep up with a growing backlog of streetlights around the community.
Last year, City Council – recognizing an urgent public safety need – asked Colorado Springs Utilities to assist the municipal government in addressing a backlog of nearly 8,000 street lights in the community.
Since Colorado Springs Utilities already installs, maintains and operates the city’s streetlight program, City Council recognized the economies of scale and efficiencies in moving the funding mechanism for the streetlight program from the municipal government to the community-owned utility.
If approved by City Council in December, Colorado Springs Utilities would take primary financial responsibility for the streetlight program in 2003.
UTILITY BILL IMPACTS
If approved by City Council, beginning February 1, 2003, a Street Light Service Charge would be added to Colorado Springs Utilities’ commercial and residential customers’ monthly utility bill, providing they operate their business or live within the Colorado Springs city limits.
Residential customers would see a Street Light Service Charge of approximately $1.79 per month.
Non-residential customers would see a Street Light Service Charge of approximately $4.86 per month.
Copyright © 2002, Matthew T. Russell. All rights reserved.